Opinion
10878-16 7671-17
09-29-2023
LUMINITA ROMAN, ET AL., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER
Emin Toro Judge.
On September 22, 2023, petitioners filed in the above referenced cases a Reply for Petitioners (Doc. 170 in docket no. 10878-16 and Doc. 149 in docket no. 7671-17) with a cover sheet entitled "Seriatim Answering Brief." On the same date, a second Reply for Petitioners (Doc. 171 in docket no. 10878-16 and Doc. 150 in docket no. 7671-17) was filed with a cover sheet entitled "Simultaneous Reply Brief." It appears that the only difference in the two Replies for Petitioners is the title of the cover sheet.
On September 26, 2023, petitioner Luminita Roman confirmed with Court personnel that both Replies were identical and the only difference in the two Replies was the title of the cover sheets. Ms. Roman further confirmed that the second Reply filed with the cover sheet entitled "Simultaneous Reply Brief" was the correct filing. Upon due consideration, it is hereby
ORDERED that petitioners' Reply for Petitioners (Doc. 170 in docket no. 10878-16 and Doc. 149 in docket no. 7671-17) with a cover sheet entitled "Seriatim Answering Brief" is hereby stricken from the record in these cases.