Roman v. City of New York

Full title: CARLOS ROMAN, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 24, 1992

187 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

November 24, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.).

No appeal as of right lies from an order that merely rules on the admissibility of evidence during a trial (CPLR 5701 [a] [2]). Rather, such rulings are to be reviewed on appeal from the judgment after trial (Kopstein v City of New York, 87 A.D.2d 547). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, and we do not address the merits of the rulings.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.