From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rolon v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 29, 2001
288 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

November 29, 2001.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

David H. Savidge, Prisoners' Legal Services, Albany, for petitioner.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Rose and, Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits assault on another inmate. The misbehavior report related that on the evening of December 1, 1999, an inmate was slashed across the face and head on a walkway near the correctional facility's indoor recreation area. The misbehavior report also sets forth the victim's detailed description of his attacker as a young, light-skinned Hispanic male, approximately 5 feet, 10 inches in height, who worked in the mess hall. When shown a photo array, the victim, without hestitation, positively identified petitioner as the individual who had assaulted him.

The misbehavior report, along with the victim's photo array identification of petitioner, the testimony of the authoring and investigating correction officer, and the testimony of the victim who again positively identified petitioner as his attacker, constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Esteves v. Coughlin, 157 A.D.2d 895). While petitioner and his inmate witness gave testimony in which they asserted that petitioner was innocent, this presented an issue of credibility which was resolved by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Caraway v. Herbert, 285 A.D.2d 778; Matter of Fereira v. Coombe, 239 A.D.2d 905, 906). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Rolon v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 29, 2001
288 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Rolon v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT ROLON, Petitioner, v. GLENN GOORD, as Commissioner…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 29, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 303

Citing Cases

Pagan v. Venettozzi

We confirm. The misbehavior report, the victim's photo array identification of petitioner and related…