From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rolnick v. Rolnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1968
29 A.D.2d 987 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

April 22, 1968


Appeal by defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 1, 1967, which denied defendant's motion for summary judgment predicated upon the ground that the cause of action alleged in the complaint is barred by the Statute of Limitations. Order reversed, with $30 costs and disbursements, and summary judgment granted in favor of defendant, dismissing the complaint. In our opinion, regardless of the label applied by plaintiff, the cause of action alleged is for the traditional tort of inducing a breach of plaintiff's employment contract. The cause of action accrued on March 16, 1962, and was governed by the three-year Statute of Limitations relating to actions to recover damages for injury to property (former Civ. Prac. Act, § 49, subd. 7). The present action, commenced on February 11, 1966, is thus barred. Beldock, P.J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [ 55 Misc.2d 243.]


Summaries of

Rolnick v. Rolnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1968
29 A.D.2d 987 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Rolnick v. Rolnick

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT ROLNICK, Respondent, v. JACOB ROLNICK, Defendant-Appellant and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1968

Citations

29 A.D.2d 987 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Woodbridge Plastics, Inc. v. Borden, Inc.

New York courts have applied CPLR § 214(4)'s three-year limitations period to claims of intentional…

Williams v. Arpie

As for the second cause of action, plaintiff describes it in the amended complaint as wrongful and tortious…