Opinion
NO. 3:12-cv-162 GLL
03-07-2013
ROLLOCK COMPANY, et al, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant
KEEVICAN WEISS BAUERLE & HIRSCH LLC Brian P. Fagan, Esq. PA ID No. 72203 Justin M. Tuskan, Esq. PA ID No. 311235 Counsel for Plaintiffs Rollock Company, Anthony Kordell and Christopher Kordell DAVID J. HICKTON UNITED STATES ATTORNEY KATHRYN KENEALLY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL Yonatan Gelblum Counsel for the United States of America
INTERIM ORDER ON DISCOVERY
AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2013, on the consent of the parties below, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that before the Initial Local Rule 16.1 scheduling conference in this matter, Defendant, but not Plaintiffs, may propound discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by stipulation of the parties below, depositions prior to the initial scheduling conference shall not count towards the presumptive limits in Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(1) with respect to discovery after such conference.
Gary L. Lancaster
HON. GARY L. LANCASTER, CHIEF JUDGE
Seen and agreed
KEEVICAN WEISS BAUERLE &
HIRSCH LLC
By: _______________
Brian P. Fagan, Esq.
PA ID No. 72203
Justin M. Tuskan, Esq.
PA ID No. 311235
Counsel for Plaintiffs Rollock
Company, Anthony Kordell and
Christopher Kordell
DAVID J. HICKTON
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
KATHRYN KENEALLY
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY
GENERAL
By: _______________
Yonatan Gelblum
Counsel for the United States of
America