From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roller v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 28, 2024
24-cv-01563-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-01563-JD

08-28-2024

DAVID ROLLER, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE

JAMES DONATO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court is advised that the parties have settled. Dkt. No. 24. Consequently, the Court vacates all pretrial deadlines and dismisses this case without prejudice. If any party certifies to the Court within 45 days from the date of this order that the agreed consideration for the settlement of this action has not been delivered, this order will be vacated and the case will be set for a case management conference. If no certification is filed, the dismissal will be deemed to be with prejudice after the 45 days.

The parties are directed not to ask the Court for a “dismissal with prejudice” at any time after this order, or to ask for an order confirming dismissal under FRCP 41(a)(1). No Court order is necessary for dismissal under that rule.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Roller v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 28, 2024
24-cv-01563-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Roller v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ROLLER, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 28, 2024

Citations

24-cv-01563-JD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2024)