From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rolle v. Hankinson

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 12, 2009
555 U.S. 1093 (2009)

Opinion

No. 08–7006.

01-12-2009

Randall Lamont ROLLE, petitioner, v. James C. HANKINSON, et al.


Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).

Justice STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, 113 S.Ct. 397, and cases cited therein.


Summaries of

Rolle v. Hankinson

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 12, 2009
555 U.S. 1093 (2009)
Case details for

Rolle v. Hankinson

Case Details

Full title:Randall Lamont ROLLE, petitioner, v. James C. HANKINSON, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 12, 2009

Citations

555 U.S. 1093 (2009)
129 S. Ct. 920
173 L. Ed. 2d 102
77 U.S.L.W. 3399