From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rolland v. Lebowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 1997
243 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 20, 1997

Appeal from the Surrogate's Court, Westchester County (Emanuelli, S.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant personally.

It is well settled that a party attempting to vacate a default judgment must establish both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious claim or defense ( see, Putney v. Pearlman, 203 A.D.2d 333; Schiavetta v. McKeon, 190 A.D.2d 724). The plaintiff has failed to satisfy this standard.

Bracken, J.P., Pizzuto, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rolland v. Lebowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 20, 1997
243 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Rolland v. Lebowitz

Case Details

Full title:CAROLINE ROLLAND, Individually and as Adminstratrix of the Estate of HYMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
668 N.Y.S.2d 904