Opinion
C086142
07-16-2019
In re the Marriage of BRADLEY and MARY ROLES. BRADLEY ROLES, Appellant, v. MARY ROLES, Respondent.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Super. Ct. No. FL045097)
Bradley Roles, appellant appearing in propia persona, appeals from the trial court's October 6, 2017, order. Appellant challenges the court's order relative to money being held in a trust account.
First, and foremost, the order from which appellant appeals is not an appealable order. (See Code of Civ. Proc., § 904.1.) The order is not a judgment, nor does it appear to be an order after judgment as there is no judgment in the record on appeal.
Second, were this appeal from an appealable order, appellant has failed to support his request for relief with any citation to the record or to relevant legal authority. Accordingly, his claims are forfeited. (Badie v. Bank of America (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 779, 784-785; Lewis v. County of Sacramento (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 107, 113.)
Finally, appellant appears to be asking this court to order the distribution of money from his former attorney's trust account. He misunderstands the role of this court; issuing such an order is not within our jurisdiction.
The appeal is dismissed.
/S/_________
RENNER, J. We concur: /S/_________
HULL, Acting P. J. /S/_________
MURRAY, J.