From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rolando v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
May 8, 2015
NO. 2015 CW 0283 (La. Ct. App. May. 8, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 2015 CW 0283

05-08-2015

MARY K. ROLANDO v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, AND MARIA RADOSTA


In Re: Maria Radosta and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 2013-14495.

BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., McCLENDON AND HIGGINBOTHAM, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. This Court declines to exercise its supervisory jurisdiction. The criteria set forth in Herlitz Construction Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 396 So.2d 878 (La. 1981) (per curiam), are not met.

TMH

VGW

McClendon, J., dissents and would grant relator's writ application. COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

Rolando v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
May 8, 2015
NO. 2015 CW 0283 (La. Ct. App. May. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Rolando v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARY K. ROLANDO v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: May 8, 2015

Citations

NO. 2015 CW 0283 (La. Ct. App. May. 8, 2015)