From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roland v. Napolitano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 8, 1989
150 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

May 8, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant Napolitano appeals from the denial of his motion to dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens. The appellant bears the burden of demonstrating that the relevant factors militated against the court's retention of jurisdiction of the action (see, Islamic Republic v Pahlavi, 62 N.Y.2d 474, 479), and upon our review of the record, it is clear that the factors weighed in favor of the plaintiff's choice of forum. Moreover, we find that the court properly considered and balanced the various competing factors and did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the motion (see, Banco Ambrosiano v Artoc Bank Trust, 62 N.Y.2d 65, 73-74). Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Bracken and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Roland v. Napolitano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 8, 1989
150 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Roland v. Napolitano

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL F. ROLAND, Respondent, v. JOHN J. NAPOLITANO, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 8, 1989

Citations

150 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)