finding no "support for the bald proposition ... that agency members who participate in an investigation are disqualified from adjudicating"
Summary of this case from Grater v. Damascus Twp. Trs.No. 90-1343.
May 22, 1991.
E.D.Mich.; Appealing after remand 856 F.2d 764.
AFFIRMED
finding no "support for the bald proposition ... that agency members who participate in an investigation are disqualified from adjudicating"
Summary of this case from Grater v. Damascus Twp. Trs.concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in a § 1983 case by admitting into evidence two investigative reports, one federal and one state, investigating violence at the pertinent prison, when the court "found the police and Justice Department reports would be helpful to the jury in determining whether the defendants acted with deliberate indifference" and when "[e]ach [report] was admissible under Fed. R. Evid. 803(C) as a public report ‘made pursuant to authority granted by law’ "
Summary of this case from Simpkins v. Boyd Cnty. Fiscal CourtIn Rebel Motor Freight, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 933 F.2d 1009 (6th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 617, 116 L.Ed.2d 638 (1991), the Sixth Circuit considered an appeal from the ICC over the interstate transportation of dog food.
Summary of this case from Cincinnati Bell Telephone v. Allnet Comm.Full title:Roland v. Johnson
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: May 22, 1991
That issue involves the admissibility of Michigan State Police reports concerning the investigation of the…
U.S. S.E.C. v. LowerySecurities Act § 2(a)(1) and Exchange Act § 3(a)(10) provide essentially identical definitions of "security."…