From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rokhifar v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 2, 2003
113 S.W.3d 684 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 82313

September 2, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable John F. Kintz.

Gwenda R. Robinson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris, III, Linda Lemke, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Clifford H. Ahrens, P.J., William H. Crandall, Jr. and Lawrence E. Mooney, JJ.



ORDER


The movant, Hossein Rokhifar, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He contends he involuntarily pleaded guilty because his plea counsel assured him he would receive a sentence totaling ten years' imprisonment.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Rokhifar v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Sep 2, 2003
113 S.W.3d 684 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Rokhifar v. State

Case Details

Full title:HOSSEIN ROKHIFAR, Movant/Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Sep 2, 2003

Citations

113 S.W.3d 684 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)