From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rojas v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Apr 17, 2020
292 So. 3d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D19-1785

04-17-2020

Jose Luis ROJAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Scott G. Hubbard, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Scott G. Hubbard, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to strike the $3 cost assessed pursuant to section 318.18, Florida Statutes (2018), as Appellant was not convicted of an offense to which this fee applies. See Sorenson v. State, 291 So.3d 630, 630 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb. 21, 2020).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions.

EVANDER, C.J., LAMBERT and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).


Summaries of

Rojas v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Apr 17, 2020
292 So. 3d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Rojas v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSE LUIS ROJAS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 17, 2020

Citations

292 So. 3d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)