From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rojas v. Signature Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 1, 2019
18-CV-6757(KAM) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 1, 2019)

Opinion

18-CV-6757(KAM)

08-01-2019

CARLOS ROJAS, Plaintiff, v. SIGNATURE BANK, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KIYO A. MATSUMOTO, United States District Judge :

On March 22, 2019, the court dismissed the complaint filed in this action by plaintiff Carlos Rojas, proceeding pro se, for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. In light of plaintiff's pro se status, the court granted him thirty days to file an amended complaint. The court's order provided that "if plaintiff fails to comply with this [o]rder within the time allowed, the action shall be dismissed, and judgment shall enter." More than thirty days elapsed, but plaintiff did not file an amended complaint.

Considering plaintiff's pro se status, the court granted him additional time to file an amended complaint. Specifically, on May 23, 2019, the court ordered plaintiff to file an amended complaint, or otherwise respond to the court, no later than June 3, 2019. Again, this order clearly stated that if plaintiff failed to file his amended complaint within the allotted time, this action would "be dismissed for failure to comply with court orders and to prosecute this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41."

Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, and the time for doing so has passed. Plaintiff has now failed to comply with two court orders directing him to file an amended complaint. However, in light of plaintiff's pro se status, the court will grant plaintiff one final extension of thirty days to file an amended complaint. If plaintiff fails to comply with this Order by that date, the court will enter judgment dismissing his action without prejudice for failure to comply with court orders and to prosecute this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to pro se plaintiff and to note service on the docket.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: Brooklyn, New York

August 1, 2019

/s/ USDJ KIYO A. MATSUMOTO

Hon. Kiyo A. Matsumoto

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rojas v. Signature Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 1, 2019
18-CV-6757(KAM) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 1, 2019)
Case details for

Rojas v. Signature Bank

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS ROJAS, Plaintiff, v. SIGNATURE BANK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 1, 2019

Citations

18-CV-6757(KAM) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 1, 2019)