From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rojas v. Prudential Grace Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1982
86 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

February 22, 1982


In a personal injury action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated April 13, 1981, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss the complaint granted. Special Term abused its discretion in denying the motion in view of the fact that the record shows no more than law office failure (see Barasch v Micucci, 49 N.Y.2d 594; Crucilla v. Howe Richardson Scale Co., 80 A.D.2d 575). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Gibbons and Thompson, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rojas v. Prudential Grace Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1982
86 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Rojas v. Prudential Grace Lines, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT ROJAS, Respondent, v. PRUDENTIAL GRACE LINES, INC., Appellant. (And…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1982

Citations

86 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)