Opinion
Case No. EDCV 11-01247 VAP (SPx)
10-06-2011
ELIZABETH ROJAS, EDUARDO ROJAS v. PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK, FSB, GARRI NICKEL, LAW OFFICE OF KIMBALL TIREY & ST. JOHN, LLP; DANIELLE T KUSSLET, SBN 180144; SHELLEY M. CRAWFORD, BAR #219957; ALL PARTIES OF INTERESTED
PRIORITY SEND
CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL
PRESENT: HONORABLE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
+-------------------------------+ ¦Marva Dillard ¦None Present ¦ +----------------+--------------¦ ¦Courtroom Deputy¦Court Reporter¦ +-------------------------------+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:¦ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:¦ +---------------------------------+---------------------------------¦ ¦None ¦None ¦ +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
PROCEEDINGS: MINUTE ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE; (2) VACATING OCTOBER 17, 2011 HEARING (IN CHAMBERS)
The Court has received and considered all papers filed in support of the Motion to Dismiss ("Motion") filed by Defendants Provident Savings Bank, FSB, and Garri Nickel ("Defendants"). Defendants' Motion is appropriate for resolution without a hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15.
Defendants filed their Motion on September 6, 2011, to be heard on October 17, 2011. Under Local Rule 7-9, a party must file opposition papers no later than 21 days before the date designated for the hearing of the motion. Plaintiffs Elizabeth Rojas, Eduardo Rojas ("Plaintiffs") filed no timely opposition. Under Local Rule 7-12, the Court finds Plaintiffs have consented to granting the Motion. Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.