From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rojas v. Fla. Cancer Specialists & Research Inst.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Apr 15, 2024
2:24-cv-331-SPC-NPM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-331-SPC-NPM

04-15-2024

MAGALY ROJAS, Plaintiff, v. FLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS & RESEARCH INSTITUTE, LLC, d/b/a FLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS & RESEARCH INST. Defendant.


ORDER

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is a review of the docket. A judge must disqualify if her “impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). She must also disqualify in certain situations listed in § 455(b). And all doubts are “resolved in favor of recusal.” Murray v. Scott, 253 F.3d 1308, 1310 (11th Cir. 2001). Because uses a doctor associated with Defendant Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute, LLC treats an immediate family member of the undersigned, disqualification may be required. See 28 U.S.C. § 455(b). So to avoid even the appearance of partiality or impropriety, the undersigned must recuse. See Liljeberg v. Health Servs. Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 865 (1988).

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Honorable Sheri Polster Chappell is RECUSED from this action.
2. The Clerk is DIRECTED to reassign this case to another United States District Judge in the Fort Myers Division.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rojas v. Fla. Cancer Specialists & Research Inst.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Apr 15, 2024
2:24-cv-331-SPC-NPM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Rojas v. Fla. Cancer Specialists & Research Inst.

Case Details

Full title:MAGALY ROJAS, Plaintiff, v. FLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS & RESEARCH…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Apr 15, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-331-SPC-NPM (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2024)