From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rojas v. City of Campbell

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 23, 2021
20-cv-08611-NC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-08611-NC

08-23-2021

ERIC ROJAS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CAMPBELL, Defendant.


ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL RE: DKT. NO. 16

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 60 days. All scheduled dates are VACATED.

The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 60 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rojas v. City of Campbell

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 23, 2021
20-cv-08611-NC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Rojas v. City of Campbell

Case Details

Full title:ERIC ROJAS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CAMPBELL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 23, 2021

Citations

20-cv-08611-NC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2021)