From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rojas v. CDCR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 29, 2019
No. 2:18-cv-1740 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2019)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-1740 KJM CKD P

01-29-2019

JOSE A. ROJAS, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed December 18, 2018, plaintiffs complaint was dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was given until January 18, 2019 to file his amended complaint and he has not done so. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint by the deadline would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: January 29, 2019

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1
roja1740.fta


Summaries of

Rojas v. CDCR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 29, 2019
No. 2:18-cv-1740 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2019)
Case details for

Rojas v. CDCR

Case Details

Full title:JOSE A. ROJAS, Plaintiff, v. CDCR, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 29, 2019

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-1740 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2019)