From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rohrer Brothers, Inc. v. Super Fresh Wholesale Foods

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 13, 2011
2:10-cv-03390-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2011)

Opinion

2:10-cv-03390-GEB-CMK.

April 13, 2011


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO INTERVENE

This matter is deemed suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. R. 230(g).


Intervenor-Applicant Greenfield Fresh, Inc. ("Movant") moves to intervene as a Plaintiff in this action, arguing it is entitled to intervene as a matter of right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 24(a)(2) or, in the alternative, permissively under Rule 24(b). Movant attached to its intervention motion a proposed "Intervening Complaint." No party opposes the motion.

Since it is evident that movant may intervene under Rule 24(b), this portion of the motion is granted, and the issue of whether intervention is appropriate under Rule 24(a)(2) is not reached. Therefore, the Movant has ten days leave from the date on which this order is filed within which to file the proposed "Intervening Complaint" attached to its motion.

Dated: April 12, 2011


Summaries of

Rohrer Brothers, Inc. v. Super Fresh Wholesale Foods

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 13, 2011
2:10-cv-03390-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Rohrer Brothers, Inc. v. Super Fresh Wholesale Foods

Case Details

Full title:ROHRER BROTHERS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. SUPER FRESH…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 13, 2011

Citations

2:10-cv-03390-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2011)