ROHR v. STATE

Full title: ELIZABETH A. ROHR, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, STATE

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Mar 26, 2009

Nos. 2-09-004-CR, 2-09-005-CR, 2-09-006-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 26, 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 2-09-004-CR, 2-09-005-CR, 2-09-006-CR

Delivered: March 26, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Appealed from the 211th district court of Denton County.

PANEL: CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION¹

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

PER CURIAM.

On January 5, 2009, appellant Elizabeth A. Rohr filed three pro se notices of appeal. On January 7, 2009, we sent a letter to appellant stating our concern that we are without jurisdiction because the trial court has not entered any appealable orders, and we informed appellant that unless she or any party filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals on or before January 19, 2009, the appeals could be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant has filed no response. Because we generally have jurisdiction to consider an appeal in a criminal case only when there has been a judgment of conviction, and appellant has shown us no grounds for continuing the appeals, we dismiss these appeals for want of jurisdiction.²

2 See McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1996, no pet.).