From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ROHN v. BEARD

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 2, 2007
Civil Action No. 05-1584 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-1584.

March 2, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This prisoner civil rights suit was commenced on November 16, 2005, with the filing of petition to proceed in forma pauperis, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Francis X. Caiazza for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on February 5, 2007, recommended that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted, and that the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. A copy of the Report and Recommendation was sent to the Plaintiff by First Class United States Mail to SCI Fayette. The parties were allowed ten days from the date of service to file objections. Objections were due on February 22, 2007. No objections have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 2nd day of March 2007,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 26) is GRANTED, and that the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 22) is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Caiazza, (Doc. 37), dated February 5, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

ROHN v. BEARD

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 2, 2007
Civil Action No. 05-1584 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2007)
Case details for

ROHN v. BEARD

Case Details

Full title:JAMOD-KHALIL ROHN, Plaintiff, v. DR. JEFFREY A. BEARD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 2, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-1584 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2007)

Citing Cases

Rohn v. Beard

Rohn previously brought the same claim in District Court, which granted the defendant's motion for summary…