Roggenbuck v. State

Full title: Robin S. Roggenbuck, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Sep 22, 2015

469 S.W.3d 458 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

2015-09-22

Robin S. Roggenbuck, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Platte County, Missouri, The Honorable Abe Shafer IV, Judge Jeannette L. Wolpink, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Per curiam:

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Platte County, Missouri, The Honorable Abe Shafer IV, Judge
Jeannette L. Wolpink, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Two: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Cynthia L. Martin, Judge

ORDER

Per curiam:

Robin Roggenbuck appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion following an evidentiary hearing. Roggenbuck contends that the motion court clearly erred in finding that he did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel did not object to three verdict directors which failed to specify a particular incident of alleged possession of child pornography, making it unclear as to which of several incidents Roggenbuck was found guilty. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).