From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Waste Pro of Fla.

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Jun 5, 2024
386 So. 3d 663 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)

Opinion

No. 1D2023-1683

06-05-2024

Erin ROGERS, Appellant, v. WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA, INC., Appellee.

Adrian R. Bridges and Marcus J. Michles II of Michles & Booth, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant. Charles M-P George of Law Offices of Charles M-P George, Coral Gables, for Appellee.


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Amy P. Brodersen, Judge.

Adrian R. Bridges and Marcus J. Michles II of Michles & Booth, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.

Charles M-P George of Law Offices of Charles M-P George, Coral Gables, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed. See Wald v. Grainger, 64 So. 3d 1201, 1205 (Fla. 2011) ("A jury is free to weigh the opinion testimony of expert witnesses, and either accept, reject or give that testimony such weight as it deserves considering the witnesses’ qualification, the reasons given by the witness for the opinion expressed, and all other evidence in the case, including lay testimony."); see also Reid v. Med. & Pro. Mgmt. Consultants, Inc., 744 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for new trial because in an ordinary negligence case, the jury is free to accept or reject the testimony of a medical expert).

Osterhaus, C.J., and Rowe and Long, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Waste Pro of Fla.

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Jun 5, 2024
386 So. 3d 663 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)
Case details for

Rogers v. Waste Pro of Fla.

Case Details

Full title:ERIN ROGERS, Appellant, v. WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA, INC., Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Jun 5, 2024

Citations

386 So. 3d 663 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)