Opinion
Cause No. 3:05-CV-359 RM (Arising from 93-CR-00059(04)RM).
June 15, 2005
OPINION AND ORDER
On June 13, Mr. Robert Rogers filed yet another petition to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Mr. Rogers already filed at least three previous § 2255 petitions, so this filing must be again be considered a second or successive petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2244 provides that before a second or successive motion is filed with the district court, "the applicant shall move in the appropriate court of appeals for an order authorizing the district court to consider the application."
Accordingly, Mr. Rogers' petition is SUMMARILY DISMISSED [Doc. No. 1 of the civil docket] as not properly before this court.
SO ORDERED.