From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Tristar Prods. Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 23, 2011
430 F. App'x 899 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Opinion

Nos. 2011-1494, 2011-1495.

September 23, 2011.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in case no. 11-CV-1111, Judge Eduardo C. Robreno.

Edward T. Kang, Weir Partners, Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Edward P. Bakos, Bakos Kritzer, Florham Park, NJ, for Defendant-Appellee.

ON MOTION ORDER

The United States moves for a stay of proceedings pending this court's decision in FLFMC v. Wham-O, No. 2011-1067, and Unique Prod. Solutions v. Hy-Grade Valve, Inc., Nos. 2011-1254, -1284.

On September 16, 2011, the President signed into law the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, H.R. 1249, 112th Cong. (1st Sess. 2011), amending 35 U.S.C. § 292 and including the following text regarding the effective date of this provision: "The amendments made by this subsection shall apply to all cases, without exception, that are pending on, or commenced on or after, the date of the enactment of this Act." Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, § 16(b)(4).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The briefing schedule is stayed.

(2) Each party shall advise the court within 21 days of the date of this order of the effect of this legislation on the status of this case.

(3) The response shall contain any necessary motion deemed appropriate by the party, but may not exceed 15 pages.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Tristar Prods. Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 23, 2011
430 F. App'x 899 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Rogers v. Tristar Prods. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE A. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 23, 2011

Citations

430 F. App'x 899 (Fed. Cir. 2011)