Rogers v. Tristar Prods., Inc.

Full title: BRUCE A. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 15, 2012

2011-1494 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 15, 2012)

Opinion

2011-1494 2011-1495

02-15-2012

BRUCE A. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND UNITED STATES, Defendant-Cross-Appellant.

Eduardo C. Rohreno

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Pennsylvania in case no. 11-CV-1111,

Judge Eduardo C. Rohreno.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of Bruce A. Rogers's motion for panel reconsideration,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

TriStar Products, Inc. and the United States are directed to respond to Rogers's arguments regarding the constitutionality of applying 35 U.S.C. § 292 as amended by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act to this case within 30 days from the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

__________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
cc: Edward T. Kang, Esq.

Edward P. Bakos, Esq.

Douglas N. Letter, Esq.
s19