From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Studio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 27, 2013
11-CV-4493 (ARR)(RER) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

11-CV-4493 (ARR)(RER)

02-27-2013

AARON JAMES ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. ECOLOR STUDIO and MANISH MORWAL, Defendants.


NOT FOR ELECTRONIC OR PRINT PUBLICATION


ORDER

ROSS, United States District Judge:

The court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated February 7, 2013, from the Honorable Ramon E. Reyes, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. Accordingly, the court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. See Advisory Comm. Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); accord Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-CV-1930682 (CBA) (LB), 2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I hereby adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

I therefore grant plaintiff's motion for default judgment. Plaintiff shall be awarded $50,000 in statutory damages due to defendants' willful infringement of the computer-animated short film entitled "Ornaments," as well as a permanent injunction to prevent defendants from further infringing plaintiff's copyright (registration number PAu002534222)

SO ORDERED.

Allyne R. Ross

United States District Judge
Dated: February 27, 2013

Brooklyn, New York


Summaries of

Rogers v. Studio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 27, 2013
11-CV-4493 (ARR)(RER) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Rogers v. Studio

Case Details

Full title:AARON JAMES ROGERS, Plaintiff, v. ECOLOR STUDIO and MANISH MORWAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

11-CV-4493 (ARR)(RER) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 2013)