In Rogers v. Stephens (86 N.Y. 623), in the quoted part of the opinion, the court referred to an act of the Legislature then in question as a "local" one, etc.
Summary of this case from Matter of Douglas v. FoleyArgued October 5, 1881
Decided October 18, 1881
D. Rumsey for appellants.
George B. Bradley for respondents.
Per curiam opinion for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Rogers v. Stephens (86 N.Y. 623), in the quoted part of the opinion, the court referred to an act of the Legislature then in question as a "local" one, etc.
Summary of this case from Matter of Douglas v. FoleyFull title:JOHN ROGERS et al., Appellants, v . REDMOND D. STEPHENS et al., Respondents
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 18, 1881
In People v. O'Brien ( 38 N.Y. 193) Judge GROVER defined a local act of the Legislature as one "confined in…
Andes v. ElyThe legislature has still the power to ratify them and make them valid obligations of the town. Williams v.…