From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 27, 1928
117 So. 409 (Ala. Crim. App. 1928)

Opinion

8 Div. 586.

March 6, 1928. Rehearing Denied March 27, 1928.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.

Emory Rogers was convicted of manufacturing whisky and unlawfully possessing a still, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Rogers v. State, 217 Ala. 693, 117 So. 410.

O. M. Rains, of Scottsboro, for appellant.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.

No briefs reached the Reporter.


The indictment in three counts charges (1) manufacturing whisky; (2 and 3) unlawful possession of a still, etc.

There was no evidence that whisky was actually manufactured, and there was no evidence that the beer found at the still contained alcohol, but there was evidence of an attempt to manufacture whisky, and for that reason the general affirmative charge as to count (1) was properly refused. This court and the Supreme Court have both held, and section 3307 of the Code of 1923 so provides, that a conviction for an attempt to manufacture whisky may be had under a count charging its manufacture.

The evidence was sufficient to go to the jury on the other counts.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Rogers v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Mar 27, 1928
117 So. 409 (Ala. Crim. App. 1928)
Case details for

Rogers v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROGERS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Mar 27, 1928

Citations

117 So. 409 (Ala. Crim. App. 1928)
22 Ala. App. 410

Citing Cases

Terry v. State

Since on one reasonable theory or phase of the evidence the jury might have found defendant guilty of an…

Rogers v. State

SAYRE, J. Petition of Emory Rogers for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment…