From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 10, 2009
297 S.W.3d 136 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED92392.

November 10, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 2296P-03520, Bryan Hettenbach, Judge.

Edward Scott Thompson, Jefferson City, MO, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, James B. Farnsworth, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.



ORDER


Wayne Rogers appeals from the motion court's Order and Judgment (judgment) denying his Motion to Reinstate Post-Conviction Proceedings, which asked the motion court to reopen his Rule 29.15 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct the Judgment or Sentence on the ground that he was effectively abandoned by his private appellate counsel.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). No error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Rogers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 10, 2009
297 S.W.3d 136 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Rogers v. State

Case Details

Full title:Wayne ROGERS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Nov 10, 2009

Citations

297 S.W.3d 136 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)