From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Apr 2, 1985
686 S.W.2d 25 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 48247.

December 31, 1984. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 13, 1985. Application to Transfer Denied April 2, 1985.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, CITY OF ST. LOUIS, DANIEL T. TILLMAN, J.

John Putzel, Asst. Public Defender, Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit, St. Louis, for appellant.

John Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Thomas Carter, II, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.


Movant Wayne Rogers (hereinafter defendant) appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion. He challenges two concurrent eleven-year sentences for first degree robberies rendered upon his guilty pleas.

Defendant testified he pled guilty because his counsel had advised him that if he pled not guilty, as a persistent offender he could be sentenced to as much as 30 years in prison. Defendant did not call trial counsel to testify.

The motion court found against defendant's claim trial counsel had told him what his punishment would be if he was found to be a persistent offender. The hearing court ruled defendant had failed to show his guilty plea was involuntary for any reason.

VanMoore v. State, 667 S.W.2d 470[1, 2] (Mo.App. 1984) holds that on a Rule 27.26 hearing it is movant's burden to show error by preponderance of the evidence, and a trial court may reject movant's testimony even though uncontradicted. So it is here.

Affirmed.

DOWD, P.J., and CRIST, J., concur.


Summaries of

Rogers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Apr 2, 1985
686 S.W.2d 25 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Rogers v. State

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE H. ROGERS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Apr 2, 1985

Citations

686 S.W.2d 25 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985)