From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 14, 2001
784 So. 2d 470 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 1D00-1372.

Opinion filed March 14, 2001.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Judge George S. Reynolds, III.

The conviction is REVERSED.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Thomas D. Winokur, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


We find that the trial court improperly denied the appellant's motion for judgment of acquittal on the charge of resisting an officer without violence because under the facts presented, the officer did not have probable cause to arrest the appellant when he handcuffed him and ordered him to divulge the contents of his mouth. Because the officer was not lawfully executing a legal duty, the appellant was entitled to resist the order without violence. Williams v. State, 727 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Mayhue v. State, 659 So.2d 417 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We reject the state's argument that this issue, which was considered by the trial judge, was not preserved for appellate review.

ALLEN and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Rogers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 14, 2001
784 So. 2d 470 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Rogers v. State

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 14, 2001

Citations

784 So. 2d 470 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)