From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 21, 2020
No. 79814-COA (Nev. App. Jul. 21, 2020)

Opinion

No. 79814-COA

07-21-2020

CORNELIUS EUGENE ROGERS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Cornelius Eugene Rogers appeals from an order of the district court denying a motion to correct an illegal sentence. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Carolyn Ellsworth, Judge.

In his motion filed on July 31, 2019, Rogers claimed his trial counsel improperly conceded his guilt during the trial and the trial court improperly failed to canvass him to ascertain whether he agreed with counsel's concession strategy. Rogers's claims fell outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to correct an illegal sentence. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, without considering the merits of any of the claims raised in the motion, we conclude the district court did not err by denying the motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Tao /s/_________, J.
Bulla cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge

Cornelius Eugene Rogers

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Rogers v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 21, 2020
No. 79814-COA (Nev. App. Jul. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Rogers v. State

Case Details

Full title:CORNELIUS EUGENE ROGERS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 21, 2020

Citations

No. 79814-COA (Nev. App. Jul. 21, 2020)