From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 24, 2006
No. 05-04-00369-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 24, 2006)

Opinion

No. 05-04-00369-CR

Opinion Filed January 24, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F04-00183-KI. Affirm.

Before Justices WRIGHT, O'NEILL, and FRANCIS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Joseph Paul Rogers waived a jury trial and pleaded guilty to assault-family violence, with one prior conviction of assault-family violence, and true to one enhancement paragraph. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.01(a)(1), (b)(2) (Vernon Supp. 2005). The trial court found appellant guilty and assessed punishment at seven years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response, but appellant did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.


Summaries of

Rogers v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 24, 2006
No. 05-04-00369-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 24, 2006)
Case details for

Rogers v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH PAUL ROGERS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jan 24, 2006

Citations

No. 05-04-00369-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 24, 2006)