From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2005
No. Civ. S-05-1601 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2005)

Opinion

No. Civ. S-05-1601 MCE KJM P.

October 20, 2005


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The application attacks a conviction issued by the San Francisco Superior Court. While both this Court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in San Francisco County. Id. at 499 n. 15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2005
No. Civ. S-05-1601 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2005)
Case details for

Rogers v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL RAY ROGERS, Petitioner, v. D.L. RUNNELS, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 20, 2005

Citations

No. Civ. S-05-1601 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2005)