From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1900
54 App. Div. 195 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)

Opinion

November Term, 1900.

Carlos C. Alden, for the appellant.

Charles Caldwell, for the respondent.

Present — VAN BRUNT, P.J., RUMSEY, INGRAHAM, McLAUGHLIN and HATCH, JJ.


It may be that the affidavits objected to were not properly authenticated within the ruling of this court in Turtle v. Turtle ( 31 App. Div. 49). But that objection was not taken upon the hearing of the motion, and for that reason the defendant cannot avail himself of it here. The affidavits are sufficient to warrant the conclusion reached by the court below as to the right of the plaintiff to alimony and counsel fees, and the motion, therefore, was properly granted.

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1900
54 App. Div. 195 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)
Case details for

Rogers v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:DORA N. ROGERS, Respondent, v . CHARLES S. ROGERS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1900

Citations

54 App. Div. 195 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)
66 N.Y.S. 512

Citing Cases

Udisky v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

The challenge to the sufficiency of the affidavits submitted by the defendant, because of want of…