From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Recktenwald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE
Apr 21, 2017
Civil Action No. 16-285 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 21, 2017)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 16-285

04-21-2017

YAKEEN ROGERS, Petitioner, v. MONICA RECKTENWALD, et al., Respondents.


ORDER ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE

The Court, having considered the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter, and the balance of record, HEREBY ORDERS:

(1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 5].

(2) Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.

(3) This case is CLOSED.

(4) The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 21st day of April, 2017.

/s/_________

BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rogers v. Recktenwald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE
Apr 21, 2017
Civil Action No. 16-285 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 21, 2017)
Case details for

Rogers v. Recktenwald

Case Details

Full title:YAKEEN ROGERS, Petitioner, v. MONICA RECKTENWALD, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE

Date published: Apr 21, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 16-285 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 21, 2017)