From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 10, 2008
2008 Ohio 4487 (Ohio 2008)

Opinion

No. 2008-1234.

September 10, 2008.

Certified Questions of State Law, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Nos. 06-4422 and 06-4423.


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

On review of preliminary memoranda pursuant to S.Ct.Prac. R. XVIII(6). The court will answer the following questions:

1) Does R.C. 2919.123 mandate that physicians in Ohio who perform abortions using mifepristone do so in compliance with the forty-nine-day gestational limit described in the FDA approval letter?

2) Does R.C. 2919.123 mandate that physicians in Ohio who perform abortions using mifepristone do so in compliance with the treatment protocols and dosage indications described in the drug's final printed labeling?


Motions for admission pro hac vice of Roger K. Evans and Helene K. Krasnoff by Jennifer L. Branch granted.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 10, 2008
2008 Ohio 4487 (Ohio 2008)
Case details for

Rogers v. Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region

Case Details

Full title:Rogers v. Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Sep 10, 2008

Citations

2008 Ohio 4487 (Ohio 2008)
119 Ohio St. 3d 1440

Citing Cases

Cordray v. Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region v. Strickland (C.A.6, 2008), 531 F.3d 406, 412. We agreed to answer both…