From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Patterson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 6, 1896
44 N.E. 1128 (N.Y. 1896)

Summary

In Patterson v. Rogers, 53 Tex. 484, this court held that a defendant in a writ of error can not assign errors as against his codefendant, unless he has himself sued out a writ of error and given the statutory bond.

Summary of this case from Anderson v. Silliman

Opinion

Argued June 11, 1896

Decided October 6, 1896

George M. Baker for appellant.

Charles Fox for respondents.


Judgment affirmed on opinion below, with leave to plaintiff to amend his complaint within twenty days upon payment of costs.

All concur.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Patterson

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 6, 1896
44 N.E. 1128 (N.Y. 1896)

In Patterson v. Rogers, 53 Tex. 484, this court held that a defendant in a writ of error can not assign errors as against his codefendant, unless he has himself sued out a writ of error and given the statutory bond.

Summary of this case from Anderson v. Silliman
Case details for

Rogers v. Patterson

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW J. ROGERS, Appellant, v . ELIZABETH PATTERSON et al., Impleaded…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 6, 1896

Citations

44 N.E. 1128 (N.Y. 1896)
44 N.E. 1128

Citing Cases

Gibbons v. Hansch

28 C.J. 741, § 13. Defendants cite Patterson v. Rogers, 148 Ark. 222, 229 S.W. 711, 712; Ranft v. Reimers,…

Ehnes v. Nolan

Both deal with the right of a creditor to enforce his claim against the estate of a deceased debtor. In form,…