From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 10, 1967
28 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

July 10, 1967


Order of the Appellate Term, Second Judicial Department, dated October 21, 1966, and judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, dated December 28, 1965, reversed on the law and facts, without costs, and a new trial granted. While we agree that less demanding standards of notice apply to the plaintiff injured party than to an insured ( Lauritano v. American Fid. Fire Ins. Co., 3 A.D.2d 564, affd. 4 N.Y.2d 1028; Gluck v. London Lancashire Ind. Co., 2 A.D.2d 751, affd. 2 N.Y.2d 953; Mason v. Allstate Ins. Co., 12 A.D.2d 138; Marcus v. London Lancashire Ind. Co., 6 A.D.2d 702, affd. 5 N.Y.2d 961), we find the present record inadequate to determine whether the notice given to defendant by the injured party was given "as soon as practicable" under the provisions of the policy. Material matters de hors the record have not been considered. Christ, Acting P.J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Nolan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 10, 1967
28 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Rogers v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Company

Case Details

Full title:SIDNEY ROGERS, Respondent, v. MERCHANTS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 10, 1967

Citations

28 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Olenick v. Govt. Empl. Ins. Co.

The criterion being the circumstances confronting the carrier, significance must be given to the dilemma…

Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Co. v. Vasquez

(See Insurance Law, § 167, subd. 1, pars [c], [d]; Lauritano v. American Fid. Fire Ins. Co., 3 A.D.2d 564,…