From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. M. Jones

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Nov 22, 1933
64 S.W.2d 1119 (Tex. Civ. App. 1933)

Opinion

No. 9326.

October 18, 1933. Rehearing Denied November 22, 1933.

Appeal from District Court, Nueces County; Birge Holt, Judge.

John J. Pichinson, of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

John C. North, of Corpus Christi, for appellees.


Appellant herein sued to enjoin the appellees from selling real estate under the power of sale stipulated in a certain deed of trust.

Appellant based her petition upon the provisions of the so-called Moratorium Law, which is House Bill No. 231 (c. 102), passed by the regular session of the 43d Legislature (Vernon's Ann.Civ.St. art. 2218b).

This court has very recently decided, in the case of Malachy Murphy v. E. O. Phillips et al., 63 S.W.2d 404, that House Bill No. 231 is unconstitutional and void, wherein it attempts to stay trustee sales of real estate provided for in deeds of trust.

For the reasons therein stated, we are of the opinion that the trial judge properly refused the injunction herein prayed for by appellant.

The temporary injunction heretofore granted by this court will be, in all things, dissolved.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Rogers v. M. Jones

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Nov 22, 1933
64 S.W.2d 1119 (Tex. Civ. App. 1933)
Case details for

Rogers v. M. Jones

Case Details

Full title:Minnie Ethel ROGERS, Appellant, v. M. Tilford JONES et al., Appellees

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio

Date published: Nov 22, 1933

Citations

64 S.W.2d 1119 (Tex. Civ. App. 1933)