From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 10, 2023
2:22-cv-00867-CDS-DJA (D. Nev. Apr. 10, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00867-CDS-DJA

04-10-2023

MICHAEL ROGERS, an individual; NIKITA WRIGHT, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; JOSEPH LOMBARDO, in his official capacity as Sheriff; ALFREDO QUINTERO, individually; PRAVEEN RAJ, individually; DOE OFFICERS I - IV, individually, Defendants.

Margaret A. McLetchie, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10931 N. Pieter O' Leary, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15297 Leo S. Wolpert, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Michael Rogers and Nikita Wright MARQUIS AURBACH Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Jackie V. Nichols, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14246 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Sheriff Joseph Lombardo, Sgt. Alfredo Quintero, and Officer Praveen Raj


Margaret A. McLetchie, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 10931 N. Pieter O' Leary, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15297 Leo S. Wolpert, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Michael Rogers and Nikita Wright

MARQUIS AURBACH Craig R. Anderson, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 6882 Jackie V. Nichols, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 14246 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Sheriff Joseph Lombardo, Sgt. Alfredo Quintero, and Officer Praveen Raj

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND LVMPD DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)

DANIEL J. ALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Parties, Plaintiffs Michael Rogers and Nikita Wright (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel of record, Margaret A. McLetchie, Esq., N. Pieter O' Leary, Esq. and Leo S. Wolpert, Esq., of McLetchie Law, and Defendants, the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (the “Department” or “LVMPD”), Sheriff Joseph Lombardo (“Lombardo”), Sgt. Alfredo Quintero (“Quintero”), and Officer Praveen Raj (“Raj”), collectively (“LVMPD Defendants”), by and through their counsel of record, Craig R. Anderson, Esq. and Jackie V. Nichols, Esq., of Marquis Aurbach, and hereby agree and jointly stipulate the following:

1. The Parties agree that, due to scheduling conflicts limiting LVMPD Defendants' counsel's ability to timely and adequately respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint [ECF No. 25], the deadline for LVMPD Defendants to file an Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint shall be extended one week, from April 7, 2023, to April 14, 2023.

2. This is the first request for an extension of this deadline.

3. The Parties both submit that the instant stipulation is being offered in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The above Stipulation is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 10, 2023
2:22-cv-00867-CDS-DJA (D. Nev. Apr. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Rogers v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ROGERS, an individual; NIKITA WRIGHT, an individual, Plaintiffs…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 10, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00867-CDS-DJA (D. Nev. Apr. 10, 2023)