Rogers v. International Paper Co.

Jenny's Cleaning Service v. Reddick
46 Ark. App. 5 (Ark. Ct. App. 1994) Cited 1 times
In a related area of workers' compensation law, we have held that this combination of deceit and failure to file does not constitute substantial compliance. See Rogers v. International Paper Company, 1 Ark.App. 164, 613 S.W.2d 844 (1981). I see no basis for a distinction in the case at bar, and I respectfully dissent.
Mad Butcher, Inc. v. Parker
4 Ark. App. 124 (Ark. Ct. App. 1982) Cited 369 times
Con. Law - Discrim. - Disabilities
Regulatory - General Health
In Mad Butcher, we stated that the mere persistence of pain does not prevent a finding that the healing period has ended so long as the underlying condition has stabilized.
Our review of this question is limited to a finding of whether the Commission abused its discretion in holding the appellants liable for these services. Rogers v. International Paper Co., 1 Ark. App. 164, 613 S.W.2d 844 (1981). The administrative law judge found that the appellee's location in Flippin and its geographical distance from Little Rock was a good reason to seek care nearer his residence.