From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Hines

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 21, 1920
86 So. 524 (Ala. 1920)

Opinion

3 Div. 468.

June 30, 1920. Rehearing Denied October 21, 1920.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Autauga County; F. Lloyd Tate, Judge.

C. E. O. Timmerman, of Prattville, for appellant.

P. E. Alexander, of Prattville, for appellee.


A trial had by the court without a jury, on oral evidence, resulted in a judgment for defendant.

The suit was by attachment to enforce a landlord's lien, and the levy made on corn and other provender. We have carefully examined the record, and find that no error intervened on the trial. The evidence failed to show that the property levied upon was subject to a landlord's lien.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and GARDNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Hines

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 21, 1920
86 So. 524 (Ala. 1920)
Case details for

Rogers v. Hines

Case Details

Full title:ROGERS v. HINES

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Oct 21, 1920

Citations

86 So. 524 (Ala. 1920)
204 Ala. 549

Citing Cases

Federal Land Bank of New Orleans v. Strickland

"If he claims a lien, the burden is on him to show the existence of the lien, and that the property seized is…