From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Hendricks

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 19, 2006
No. CIV S-05-0850 DFL PAN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0850 DFL PAN P.

April 19, 2006


ORDER


On February 27, 2006, the court gave plaintiff thirty days to file an opposition to defendant's November 20, 2005, motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has responded explaining he was unaware of a motion to dismiss filed that date but he would oppose any motion defendant Hendricks made.

Defendant Hendricks filed a motion to dismiss on September 20, 2005.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the September 20, 2005 motion to dismiss.

2. Plaintiff has thirty days from the date this order is filed to file an opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss filed September 20, 2005. As explained in the February 27, 2006, order, failure to file an opposition will be deemed a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

Rogers v. Hendricks

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 19, 2006
No. CIV S-05-0850 DFL PAN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2006)
Case details for

Rogers v. Hendricks

Case Details

Full title:JAMES T. RODGERS, Plaintiff, v. JOANNE HENDRICKS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 19, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0850 DFL PAN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2006)

Citing Cases

Board of Road Revenue Commissioners v. Collins

" Branch v. Mallory, 8 Ga. App. 797 ( 70 S.E. 177). See also Hendricks v. Rogers, 22 Ga. App. 357 ( 95 S.E.…