Rogers v. Harwell

Full title: R.W. ROGERS, SR. Appellant v. LAYNE HARWELL, ET AL. Appellees

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Apr 7, 2005

No. 02-05-040-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2005)

Opinion

No. 02-05-040-CV

Delivered: April 7, 2005.

Appeal from the 48th District Court of Tarrant County.

R.W. Rogers, SR., Amarillo, TX, Pro Se.

Panel D: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ¹

1 See Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant R.W. Rogers, Sr. appeals from the trial court's interlocutory order denying his discovery motion. The order is not an appealable interlocutory order. See Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014 (Vernon Supp. 2004-05). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Stary v. DeBord, 967 S.W.2d 352, 352-53 (Tex. 1998).