From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Harden

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Jun 7, 2023
20 C 50441 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 7, 2023)

Opinion

20 C 50441

06-07-2023

Kerry Rogers (Y27318), Plaintiff, v. Correctional Officer Harden, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Hon. Philip G. Reinhard

This matter comes before the court on the May 18, 2023 Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [102] of Magistrate Judge Schneider recommending that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). The court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. Id. “If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999). In this case, objections had to be filed by June 1, 2023. No objections have been filed according to the docket. The court has reviewed the record in this case and finds that the R&R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the court adopts in its entirety Magistrate Judge Schneider's R&R [102] and dismisses the complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Harden

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Jun 7, 2023
20 C 50441 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Rogers v. Harden

Case Details

Full title:Kerry Rogers (Y27318), Plaintiff, v. Correctional Officer Harden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Date published: Jun 7, 2023

Citations

20 C 50441 (N.D. Ill. Jun. 7, 2023)