From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rogers v. Georgia Power Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 17, 1968
164 S.E.2d 268 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

43599.

SUBMITTED MAY 7, 1968.

DECIDED OCTOBER 17, 1968.

Action for damages. Brunswick City Court. Before Judge Little.

J. S. Hutto, for appellant.

Conyers, Fendig, Dickey Harris, Chris B. Conyers, Jones, Cork, Miller Benton, Wallace Miller, Jr., for appellee.


While climbing a tree located on a public right of way, plaintiff, a 16-year-old boy, came in contact with defendant's high-voltage electric transmission line which ran through the tree. In this suit to recover for the injuries thus sustained the trial court granted summary judgment for defendant. The cases of Bridges v. Ga. Power Co., 39 Ga. App. 400 ( 147 S.E. 589) and Smith v. Ga. Power Co., 43 Ga. App. 210 ( 158 S.E. 371), control the case adversely to plaintiff. See also: Brown v. Panola Light c. Co., 137 Ga. 352 ( 73 S.E. 580); Mobley v. City of Monroe, 37 Ga. App. 364 ( 140 S.E. 516); Calloway v. Central Ga. Power Co., 43 Ga. App. 820 ( 160 S.E. 703); Crosby v. Savannah Electric c. Co., 114 Ga. App. 193 ( 150 S.E.2d 563). The summary judgment for defendant is therefore

Affirmed. Quillian, J., concurs. Hall, J., concurs in the judgment.

SUBMITTED MAY 7, 1968 — DECIDED OCTOBER 17, 1968.


Summaries of

Rogers v. Georgia Power Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 17, 1968
164 S.E.2d 268 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

Rogers v. Georgia Power Company

Case Details

Full title:ROGERS, by Next Friend v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 17, 1968

Citations

164 S.E.2d 268 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)
164 S.E.2d 268

Citing Cases

Ford v. Ga. Power Co.

We affirm. 1. The trial court properly held that the case against appellee-Georgia Power is controlled…

Aversa v. Public Service Elec. Gas Co.

See Latzoni v. Garfield, 22 N.J. 84 (1956); Lumley v. West Jersey Seashore R. Co., 118 N.J.L. 140 (E. A.…